CVE Program Gets a Lifeline—But the Real Story Is Just Starting
Last month, the cybersecurity world got a wake-up call: the backbone of global vulnerability tracking—the CVE program—almost collapsed.

On April 15, MITRE revealed that its contract with CISA to run the program hadn’t been renewed, and they had about 36 hours before pulling the plug. Cue widespread panic. Then, with just hours to spare, CISA came through with an 11-month extension. Crisis averted—for now.
But the chaos lit a fire. Within days, a group of CVE insiders announced something big: they’re launching the CVE Foundation, a new, independent nonprofit aimed at fixing what they see as a fragile, outdated setup. Their goal? A more resilient, globally supported system—one not tied to a single government’s checkbook.
Not surprisingly, this ruffled feathers. Former CISA Director Jen Easterly slammed the move, calling it a conflict of interest. In her words, board members shouldn’t be building a rival organization while still governing the current one.
Meanwhile, Europe isn’t waiting around. ENISA dropped its EUVD (European Union Vulnerability Database) earlier this month, and Luxembourg’s CIRCL launched the decentralized GCVE project—both offering new ways to handle vulnerability tracking, minus the U.S. drama.
So here we are. The CVE program lives on—for now—but its near-death experience exposed the cracks. The question isn’t just about who runs it. It’s about whether the whole system needs to evolve. And depending on who you ask, that change is either long overdue—or a risky gamble.
The post CVE Program Gets a Lifeline—But the Real Story Is Just Starting appeared first on Centraleyes.