The court ruled that the Trump administration had a narrowly defined path to withhold some funds to the city that had been approved by Congress.

Elon Musk’s cost-cutting team said that it had “terminated” 89 of the department’s contracts, apparently targeting its research arm.

Quinta Jurecic discusses the constitutional crisis that the Trump administration could trigger.

Plus, a surprise blockbuster.

Attacked by two justices, lower-court judges and litigants, the 1964 ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan keeps getting cited approvingly in the Supreme Court’s decisions.

Look closely at the first two weeks of Donald Trump’s second term and you’ll see something very different than what he wants you to see.

Two weeks in, the president is quickly moving to eliminate tools of accountability.

The prospect of legal challenges to President Trump’s purges may be a feature, not a bug, for adherents of sweeping presidential authority.

A contest for control of Wisconsin’s top court may be even nastier and more expensive than its bitter 2023 predecessor, with the fate of an 1849 abortion ban and other policies at stake.

A federal judge in Seattle has issued a temporary order halting the president’s plan.

Four immigration court officials were removed from their positions on Monday. It’s unclear who is in charge at this point.

Axel Rudakubana on Monday admitted committing the deadly attack last July. Officials later said he had been referred to a government counterterrorism program three times before his rampage.

After a decisive loss at the Supreme Court, the app is set to be blocked in the U.S. starting Sunday, ending its streak of Houdini-like escapes.

The gunman took his own life after killing two judges and wounding a third in what officials described as a terrorist attack.

Once again, an incoming Trump White House is likely to clash with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. But the court in San Francisco has changed since 2017.

What we can learn from countries that have pushed back on threats to democracy.

The selection of Mr. Salam was seen as a blow to Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group and political party that has acted as the real power in Lebanon for decades.

The decision in a lawsuit brought by the State of New Jersey meant that the tolling plan could go ahead as planned, New York said. A lawyer for New Jersey disagreed.