Mention the Philistines, and many will likely (and rightly) connect them to the Bible and their many conflicts with the nation of Israel. And even though the Bible is not the only place we hear of or learn about these ancient people, it is our best resource for understanding this group, who, for over six hundred years, was Israel’s greatest enemy.

Even today, the name Philistine creates havoc for Israel. The similarity in names has led many to believe that modern-day Palestinians are descendants of the Philistines. This, in turn, has caused many to conclude that Palestinians are victims of oppression and have the rightful claim to the land known as Israel or, by some, Palestine.

But who were the Philistines? Where did they come from? Were they descended from Abraham and/or Lot like other groups in the area that Israel often fought (i.e., Midianites, Moabites, Ammonites, etc.)? Do the Palestinians descend from the Philistines? In what ways did the Philistines significantly impact Israel? Are there any practical lessons that we can learn from them today? Many questions can and should be asked regarding the Philistines, because no other nation or people group has played such a significant role in the direction and history of Israel—not even Egypt!

The Philistines and the Kingdom of Israel

Most are quite familiar with the famous one-on-one battle between David and the Philistine, Goliath (cf. 1 Sam. 17:23; 21:9-10), which brought David to national prominence and even a place in King Saul’s court and also made him an officer in the military (18:2,5). This event with the Philistine was enough on its own to forever alter the course of the history of Israel and, dare I say, the world—for the Messiah of Israel and Savior of the world would be known as The Son of David (Matt. 21:9; 22:42).

In his stand against this “uncircumcised Philistine,” David became a type of Christ in that he stood in his nation’s place and took upon himself the reproach for the nation (1 Sam. 17:42-44; Psa. 22:6 cf. Rom. 15:3; Psa. 69:9). And secondly, he stood alone to “taketh away the reproach from Israel” (1 Sam. 17:26 cf. Isa. 12:1; 51:7-12; 54:4-5; Zeph. 2; Rom. 10:11).

What started simply as a young man’s willingness to stand for God against the Philistines when no one else in the army of Israel would, catapulted David into God’s champion, but also the people’s champion: “And the women answered one another as they played, and said, Saul hath slain his thousands, and David his ten thousands” (1 Sam. 18:7).

The many battles with the Philistines didn’t merely help raise David to the throne; they were the main reason there was a throne to begin with. Israel’s demand for a king was largely predicated on their fears of the Philistines.

In 1 Samuel 7, we find that “the lords of the Philistines went up against Israel. And when the children of Israel heard it, they were afraid of the Philistines” (v. 7). As a result, Samuel called upon God, and as he was making an offering to the Lord “the Philistines drew near to battle against Israel: but the Lord thundered with a great thunder on that day upon the Philistines, and discomfited [defeated, crushed] them; and they were smitten before Israel” (v. 10). Chapter 7 concludes with the Philistines subdued and all the captured cities returned to Israel (vv. 13-14).

Though subdued, the Philistines were not gone. They remained in control of their five cities, known as the Pentapolis—Ashdod, Gaza, Askelon, Gath, and Ekron (cf. 1 Sam. 6:17)—located along the southwestern portion of Israel, near the coast of the Mediterranean Sea (cf. Zeph. 2:5).

Chapter 8 begins by telling us that Samuel had become old. Thus, with him no longer able to “judge” (defend, rule, deliver) Israel, and knowing that the Philistines were still very near, the people requested a king (1 Sam. 8:1,5). Instead of realizing the battle was the Lord’s and that He was their true judge and deliverer, the people called for a king. And the newly anointed King Saul’s first assignment from God was “to be captain over My people Israel, that he may save My people out of the hand of the Philistines” (1 Sam. 9:16).

While it was no surprise that Israel would request a king (cf. Deut. 17:14; 28:36), their reasons for doing so were most certainly not right, or else God would not have seen it as a rejection of Him (1 Sam. 8:7). Here again, we see the Philistines greatly impact the course of Israel’s future. Their presence and fierce ways caused fear in the hearts of Israel, and instead of trusting in God, they wanted a man to rule over them and deliver them. Of course, God had a plan—a plan for a future King—the King of Kings. God would turn Israel’s failure into His victory. Israel would indeed have a Man to deliver them and one day rule and reign over them—the Man Christ Jesus!

Origins

The Philistines, however, do not first appear in the days of Samuel. Even before Delilah betrayed Samson for money and turned him over to the Gentile Philistines—much like Christ was betrayed “into the hands of men” by one He trusted (cf. Matt. 17:22; 20:18-19)—the Philistines appear in both the Biblical and secular records.

The earliest mention of the Philistines in the Bible comes from Abraham’s life in Genesis 20 and
21. Abraham told the Philistine King, Abimelech, that Sarah was his sister and not his wife, causing God to intervene. Isaac would have a similar encounter with another King Abimelech (most likely the son or grandson of the one Abraham encountered cf. Gen 26). Something often overlooked is the fact that Abraham and Isaac had friendly relations with the Philistines.

In fact, Abraham lived in the land of the Philistines “many days” (Gen. 21:34) and was blessed by God. Isaac, too, was blessed by God in the sight of the Philistines. However, one of the timeless lessons from these Philistines and their encounters with Abraham and Isaac is that God was nearby, and rather than coming to Him, they determined to keep their distance. Eventually, the Philestines allowed fear and jealousy to turn them away from God (Gen. 26:14). In this regard, there are many Philistines today!

Though beyond the scope of this writing, it is worth mentioning that there is evidence to suggest that the Philistines of Abraham and Isaac’s time were different from those of the Judges’ period. In his article on the Philistines, author Christopher Eames points out that “in the Septuagint record…there are two entirely different names used to describe the Philistines. One is Φυλιστιειμ (Philistiim); the other, ἀλλόφυλοι (allophiloi). Interestingly, [the] use of the term Philistiim is found exclusively in the books from Genesis through Joshua. From Judges through the rest of the Hebrew Bible, the term allophiloi is used—a word meaning foreigners or strangers!”

Eames concludes that “here, then, we already see understanding of a clear distinction between two groups of ‘Philistine’ people. One from the start of the Bible through to Joshua—and then a dramatic change beginning with the Judges period, fitting with the very time in which archaeology reveals a new Mediterranean migration into the land.”

The word Philistine comes to us from the Egyptian word Peleset—the Hebrew word for them is Peleshet. The earliest archaeological records of the Philistines are found in Egyptian inscriptions. They were part of a group of nine distinct peoples from the Aegean area (Greece) known as the Sea Peoples. Around 1200 BC (period of the Judges), they wreaked havoc up and down the Mediterranean Coast, attacking the areas known today as Egypt, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, and Turkey. According to Egyptian records, they were eventually defeated and forced to settle in the present-day land of Gaza.

An inability to expand further south would explain why the Philistines so often attempted to move east to the land of Israel, leading to many conflicts and the need for God to raise “Judges” like Shamgar, “which slew of the Philistines six hundred men with an ox goad: and he also delivered Israel” (Judg. 3:31).

The Egyptian description of the Peleset as coming from the areas around Greece matches what the Bible tells us about their origins. According to the eighth-century BC prophet Amos, the Philistines were from Caphtor (Amos 9:7). round 100 years later, Jeremiah said, “For the Lord will spoil the Philistines, The remnant of the country of Caphtor” (Jer. 47:4).

Egyptian records help as they make it clear that Caphtor (Keftui in Egyptian) is the island of Crete, describing it as “in the midst of the Great Green (Mediterranean Sea).” Following the etymology, Caphtor in Greek is Kriti, and in English, it becomes Crete. The fact that the Philistines in the land of Israel or Canaan came from the Greek lands around Crete is of no minor significance. In truth, it has had a significant effect on world politics for the last 2000 years and is at the heart of the current issue and land disputes between Israel and the Palestinians.

The Philistines and Palestine

It would be a massive understatement to say that there have been recent disputes between the nation of Israel and the Palestinians. These disputes are certainly not new, but the dynamics have changed over the years in some respects. Besides the Palestinians refusing to acknowledge the right of Israel to exist, they also claim that the land currently known as Israel should be called Palestine and belongs to them. Is it true that the land we call Israel today was called Palestine prior? Yes, indeed it was. And for a very long time.

However, anyone who does not recognize that the land was called Israel long before it was ever called Palestine is simply failing to recognize what the Bible and archeology have already proven. According to Warren Reinsch of the Armstrong Institute of Biblical Archaeology, “The Merneptah Stele (or Israel Stele) is an engraved stone slab which describes Pharaoh Merneptah’s military victories in 1207 b.c.e. The stele itself is dated to the year 1205 b.c.e…. It contains the earliest undisputed extra-biblical reference to Israel
to date.”

Thus, in 1207 BC, the Israelites were an organized people and an established power, not some nomadic group, as many who deny the Bible have suggested. So, how did the land of Israel become known as Palestine? Well, we can thank Roman antisemitism and the Jewish revolts of the 2nd century, not to mention the Greek heritage of Israel’s greatest enemy—the Philistines!

The English word Palestine comes from the Latin word Palaestinia, which the Romans borrowed from the Greek word Palaistine. The name Palestine was first mentioned in the 5th century BC by the ancient Greek historian Herodotus, who referred to a region known as “Palaistine” located between Phoenicia and Egypt in his work, The Histories.

One can easily picture a Greek historian referring to a region inhabited by individuals of Greek descent with a name derived from their own language: Palestine. Does this suggest that the land was called Palestine by anyone else? Of course not. What it does suggest is a not-so-surprising bias of a Greek writer to project the influence of Greece to lands beyond.

It wasn’t until the 2nd century AD that Roman Emperor Hadrian, seeking to add insult to injury after quelling a Jewish revolt, renamed the territory Palestine, drawing on the name of Israel’s historical adversaries, the Philistines. Though there was no assertion that those who lived there were actual descendants of the Philistines, the name was merely used to insult Jews.

From the 2nd century until 1948, the land would be called Palestine by non-Jews and Jews alike. During this time leading up to 1948, all residents of the land were called Palestinians, even the Jews. The Jerusalem Post, founded in 1932 by a Jew, was initially named The Palestinian Post. Two years after Israel was reformed in 1948, the name was changed. During WWII, in 1942, separate companies of both Jews and Arabs from the land were formed and called The Palestinian Regiment.

Jews stopped referring to themselves as Palestinians around 1948 and almost certainly no later than 1950. It was not until around 1960 that the Palestinian Arabs dropped the extra designation and called themselves merely Palestinians.

Do these facts suggest that the rightful name today is Palestine? No. On the contrary, they clearly point to the fact that today’s Palestinians are merely one group of the whole, which was made up of both Jews and Arabs. Furthermore, the facts demonstrate that Palestinians (Palestinian Arabs) were never a separate group of people who ruled the land. On the other hand, it is clear that long before the name Palestine was forced upon the Jews, the land was called Israel and was made up of a Jewish state.

What Happened to the Philistines

So, if the Palestinians are not descended from the Philistines, then what happened to the Philistines? The Philistines were certainly a fierce and technologically advanced group. In fact, along with the Hittites, the Philistines were one of the first to advance from Bronze Age weaponry to Iron, which provided them with
a distinct advantage (cf. 1 Sam. 13:19-22).

At the time of the Exodus (1446 BC), the Philistines were so fierce and formidable that God deliberately led the people out of Egypt and in a direction to avoid them: “Lest peradventure the people repent when they see war, and they return to Egypt” (Ex. 13:17). But their time would come to an end, and the prophet Jeremiah foretold their destruction:

“The word of the Lord that came to Jeremiah the prophet against the Philistines….Thus saith the Lord; Behold, waters rise up out of the north, and shall be an overflowing flood, and shall overflow the land, and all that is therein; the city, and them that dwell therein: then the men shall cry, and all the inhabitants of the land shall howl.
“At the noise of the stamping of the hoofs of his strong horses, at the rushing of his chariots, and at the rumbling of his wheels, the fathers shall not look back to their children for feebleness of hands;
“Because of the day that cometh to spoil all the Philistines, and to cut off from Tyrus and Zidon every helper that remaineth: for the Lord will spoil the Philistines, the remnant of the country of Caphtor” (Jer. 47:1-4).

The Philistines were indeed destroyed by a nation from the north sweeping in like an “overflowing flood” and stampeded by horses and chariots. First came the Assyrians, under rulers such as Tiglath-Pileser III and Sennacherib, who exerted military pressure on the region, leading to the subjugation and destruction of several Philistine cities. Later, the Babylonians, under Nebuchadnezzar II, completed the destruction during their campaigns in the area, which also found Jerusalem and all the land of Judah destroyed and the people exiled.

However, there is at least one huge distinction between Israel and the Philistines—the people of Israel would live on and return to the land just as God said they would. After 70 years in exile, Cyrus the Great fulfilled the prophecy of Jeremiah and Isaiah and let the people return to the land of Israel and rebuild the temple (Ezra 1:1-2 cf. Isa. 44:28; Jer. 29:10).

The Philistines were Israel’s chief enemy beginning around 1200 BC. Though King David largely diminished them, they remained in the land and continued to fight against Israel and Judah until 604 BC. From them, we can see a people who were often allowed to see God’s power on display, but instead of choosing to know God, they opted to fight Him and His people.

In one such example, found in 1 Samuel, chapters 5 and 6, after the Philistines captured the Ark of the Covenant from the Israelites, they placed it in the temple of their god Dagon in Ashdod.

The next morning, the statue of Dagon fell face down before the Ark. They set the statue back up, but the following morning, it fell again, this time with its head and hands broken off.

This and other events from the Philistines are a testament that “there is no wisdom nor understanding nor counsel against the Lord” (Prov. 21:30). And “Woe unto him that striveth with his Maker!” (Isa. 45:9).

“As for God, His way is perfect: the Word of the Lord is tried: He is a buckler to all those that trust in Him” (Psa. 18:30).

“There is…One God and Father of all, Who is above all, and through all, and in you all” (Eph. 4:6).

The seventh unity of the Spirit confirms that the Apostle Paul believed that there is only one God. Many, of course, have difficulty reconciling this with the fact that God is also a Trinity. Someone once said concerning the Trinity: “If you try to explain it you will lose your mind; if you deny it you will lose your soul.” There are many things in this life that I fail to fully understand, but that doesn’t mean they are not so.

The Bible emphatically teaches us that there is one God who eternally exists in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Even though this goes far beyond our comprehension we nevertheless accept it by faith, because this is the plain teaching of the Word of God. It is helpful to remember that God has stamped His creation with countless trinities, each of which bear testimony that the concept of the Trinity does not go beyond reason. Scientists, for example, inform us that the universe is made up of basically three components: space, time, and matter. But how many universes do we have—ONE! Water can be transformed into a solid (ice), a vapor, or into a liquid. Three forms but still water! When God created man in the beginning He created him a trinity—body, soul and spirit. One of the facets then of being created in the image of God is that we, too, are a trichotomy.

The Fatherhood of God

“One God and Father of all…” (Eph. 4:6).

There are some who incorrectly assume that God is the Father of the whole human race. A case in point are those in the religious community who frequently use the phrase, “the Fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man.” Needless to say, this teaching is a subtle attack upon the truth. Nowhere in the Scriptures is God referred to as the heavenly Father of the unbeliever. As a matter of fact, the words of our Lord to the unbelieving religious leaders of His day are worthy of our attention here:

“Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but He sent me. Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it” (John 8:42-44).

This stinging rebuke indicates that these ungodly leaders refused to receive the Lord. Consequently, they were intolerant of the notion that they were of their father the devil. The Master went on to add, “He that is of God heareth God’s words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.” Contrary to popular belief, God is not the Father of those who spurn His love and cast doubt upon the counsel of His will. Unbelievers do have a father, but he is said to be the devil! And rightfully so, for they have followed Satan in his rebellion against God. The Apostle Paul concurs, stating that those who are dead in trespasses and sins walk “according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience” (Eph. 2:2).

Bringing our thoughts back to Ephesians 4:6, when the apostle makes a reference to God being the Father of all, dispensationally he has a specific group in mind. The revelation that there is only one God and Father is a well-established fact throughout Holy Scripture. What is often overlooked, however, is that a further revelation was given to Paul, in that God had predetermined before the foundation of the world to bring into existence a new entity known as the Body of Christ (Eph. 1:4,5). This has now been manifested through Paul’s gospel where we also learn the members of His Body have received a heavenly inheritance. Yes, God is the Father of believing Israel. However, the all of Ephesians 4:6 is to be limited to the believers of this age in which we are living.

When a father is handed his newborn son, a new relationship is created that can never be broken. Whether in life or death, the lad will always be the son of his father. Similarly, upon regeneration we are born from above into the family of God. So, it can be appropriately said that God is our Father and we have become His sons. Normally a father is a role model who provides for the future of his children. The same is true in the spiritual realm; we are heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ, which springs from our relationship with the Father.

A Pauline View of God

“…Who is above all, and through all, and in you all” (Eph. 4:6).

The transcendence and immanence of God are rich theological terms that describe two precious truths concerning our heavenly Father. The transcendence of God simply means that God transcends or is far above and beyond His creation. He is sovereign, eternal, being infinite in holiness, righteousness, wisdom, and knowledge. God’s supremacy is clearly seen in Daniel 4:35 where the prophet states:

“And all the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing: and He doeth according to His will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth: and none can stay His hand, or say unto Him, What doest Thou?”

Peering into the heavens through a powerful telescope only serves to show how insignificant man is in relation to the universe around him. Astronomers could only shake their heads in amazement when they discovered that there are other galaxies beyond the Milky Way. To whom shall we attribute the wonders of the starry heavens? And who placed the earth the precise distance from the sun? None other than the Lord God Almighty! Personally, I take great comfort in the sovereignty of God, that He is in control of all things.

The immanence of God teaches us that God is actively involved in the lives of His own. Paul makes this explicitly clear in the above passage when he says that God is working “through all,” that is, through each member of the Body of Christ. Obviously, the Apostle Paul did not hold to a deistic view of God. Deism denies that God exercises a constant providential control over His creation and that He never answers the prayers of His children.

The epistles of St. Paul abound with references as to how God is actively involved in both the spiritual and physical aspects of our lives. God is well-pleased when He acts in response to our prayers, as it is according to His will, of course. Being blessed with all spiritual blessings does not negate His willingness to supply for our physical needs as well.

Who could fail to see that God also intervened in the case of Epaphroditus. “…He was sick nigh unto death: but God had mercy on him…” (Phil. 2:27). It is strongly implied that the Philippians, and Paul himself, prayed for this dear brother that God would raise him up, and indeed he did—in connection with their prayers. And note: God healed Epaphroditus for Paul’s sake too, “…lest I should have sorrow upon sorrow.” It should be added here that the recovery of Epaphroditus was not due to the natural healing process that is programmed into the body. Rather it was a direct result of GOD’S MERCY upon him and Paul. Had God not intervened Epaphroditus undoubtedly would have died.

We should be careful to add that many times the response we receive back from heaven in answer to our prayers is “My grace is sufficient for thee….” In this event we are able to take comfort in the truth that, “…the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.”

We are to understand that sometimes God has a higher purpose in mind for not healing our loved one or Christian friend. It is not necessarily a lack of faith on the petitioner’s part. Possibly, the affliction is allowed as a test or perhaps to draw the individual into a closer walk with the Lord. Sometimes it’s to bring a family closer together, or even more importantly, that God’s strength might be made perfect in our weakness. Whatever the case may be, may God receive all the honor and glory that is due His name (2 Cor. 12:7-10).

Shall we bind the hands of God today to say that He will never heal the sick or supply our needs in answer to our prayers? Paul’s revelation and experience unite to declare otherwise. Our heavenly Father is a loving Father who wants us to bring all of our cares before Him. Such is the case with any father. He is interested in every detail of our lives, including those seemingly incidental things.

“You’ve probably never heard of Wilbert Williams. He’s not famous or rich. Still, Williams received an honor normally reserved for the connected, powerful, and wealthy. On December 2, 2004, the city of Chicago designated a street as Wilbert Williams Way. The honor is in celebration of his upcoming retirement.

“What did someone as unknown as Williams do to deserve such a tribute? The question becomes even more compelling when you realize that for nearly 40 years, Wilbert Williams has worked at the Woman’s Athletic Club as a doorman. Normally, an honorary street sign goes to people who get the door held open for them—not to the one holding the door.

“What set Williams apart? He has carried out his duties in an exemplary fashion. Police Officer Paul O’Donnell said, ‘In all these years, I’ve never heard him speak a harsh word about anyone. He’s a gentleman.’ Through his kindness and service to others, Williams made an impact on those who he met at the corner of Michigan and Ontario. Commenting on why he has always helped tourists, pointing them in the right direction, Williams says, ‘If I was in a different city, I’d like someone to help me.’

“Having a street named after you is impressive. How much greater the honor God promises to give to those who serve Him well, an eternal inheritance that will never spoil or fade away.”

What Should the Believer’s Work Life Look Like

“Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God:
“And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men” (Col. 3:22-23).

The word “servants” (v. 22) refers to a slave. When Paul wrote Colossians, slavery was widespread in the Roman Empire. There are differences between the institutions of ancient slavery and modern employment. However, the practical principles given by Paul for servants and masters can be applied to the employee employer relationship of our day.

Much of our lives is given to work. For the majority of us, most weeks and days are given to a job or some kind of work. Work is a significant part of who we are and what we give ourselves to, day in and day out, year in and year out. If you spend 40 hours a week on the job for 50 weeks a year, between the ages of 18 and 65, you will amass 94,000 hours on the job. God cares about what you do with all that time and has instructions for it.

In verses 22-23, Paul gives instructions for the believer who is under the authority of another in the workplace, and Paul answers the question, “What should the believer’s work-life look like?” For many believers, God has called for the workplace to be their primary mission field. It is where we spend the most time and often where we are around the most people. The way we work is a testimony to a watching world.

1. Obedience

“Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh…” (Col. 3:22).

A couple of verses earlier, Paul wrote, “Children, obey your parents in all things…” (v. 20). Then in verse 22, he wrote, “Servants, obey in all things….” This shows that the obedience the child learns from their parents in the home is important for the future obedience that they will need in the workplace.

For the employee, there is to be obedience to our “masters according to the flesh.” There is a subtle reminder here by Paul that these masters are only masters according to the flesh, meaning the believer has another Master Who is far above all (Col. 1:18). And before Him, believing employees owe submission and obedience to their employers or supervisors. Obedience in the workplace is ultimately obedience to the Lord. Of course, this instruction is not suggesting that the believer compromise his or her faith, do something contrary to God’s Word, or break the law. The point is that God wants us to respect and cooperate with the people we work for and to do as we are instructed.

2. Not with Eyeservice

“…not with eyeservice, as menpleasers…” (Col. 3:22).

“In the comic strip Calvin and Hobbes, Calvin’s boss is catching him sitting at his desk staring out the window. ‘Why aren’t you working Calvin?’ Without much thought Calvin confessed to his boss, ‘Because I didn’t see you coming.’ ”

“Eyeservice” refers to one who just works hard, or pretends to work hard, when he or she knows somebody’s watching and, as such, is a “menpleaser” and one who seeks to gain the praise and favor of others through the work being seen. The quality, effort, and thoroughness of those who work only with eyeservice drop off dramatically when they aren’t being watched.

The type of work Paul exhorts from believing employees has nothing to do with whether we are being watched or not, or whether we will get credit or not. By the grace of God, Christ desires that His Church be people of integrity who work diligently all the time, even when no earthly master is watching. We do so knowing that the Lord, our Master in heaven, sees all we do at all times (Prov. 5:21).

3. In Singleness of Heart, Fearing God

“…but in singleness of heart, fearing God” (Col. 3:22).

The word “singleness” means simple sincerity, the virtue of one who is free from pretence and hypocrisy. This sincerity comes from one’s heart. God’s grace reaches for the heart, and it changes it. The goal for our respect, cooperation, and a good work ethic on the job is that it be not just superficial but genuine from the heart.

Singleness of heart is wanting to do what is right and good in God’s sight. It’s being singularly and sincerely focused on pleasing the Lord in all we do, including in the workplace. There is more to working for the believer than just punching the clock, doing the job we are paid to do, and then punching out. We’re called to work with singleness of heart as a testimony for Christ.

Paul adds that we are to work, “fearing God.” Fearing God is about giving reverence to Him. Your job, no matter what it is, can be an act of worship. It’s been said well that “As Christians we sometimes exalt ‘spiritual’ work and downplay simple labor. However, any work, no matter how mundane, that is done for God is spiritual work.” All believers can serve the Lord in their jobs, whatever that job may be. Thus, any job becomes a ministry.

Often, many in the world look to their career to provide them with meaning and for it to bring significance to their lives. For the believer, however, Christ is the One Who gives meaning and significance to our lives. Therefore, we do not look for meaning in our career; rather we bring meaning to it by faith as we work in an attitude of worship, fearing God.

4. Do It Heartily

“And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily…” (Col. 3:23).

“Whatsoever ye do” is a comprehensive statement. One’s whole being belongs to God: body, soul, and spirit. All of life is Christian. And whatever we do in our daily employment, we should “do it heartily,” putting our hearts and souls into it, doing it wholeheartedly to the best of our abilities.

In His earthly ministry, the Lord told Israel, “And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength…” (Mark 12:30). Worship teaches us to give our whole heart to the Lord God. And stemming from our devotion to God, in our employment, we are called to work with all our hearts. Being a reliable, productive, hard worker glorifies God. As King Solomon advised, “Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might…” (Eccl. 9:10).

5. As to the Lord

“…as to the Lord, and not unto men” (Col. 3:23).

Walter Wangerin wrote the following: “If a carpenter crafts a chair for a rich stranger, he may do it well, but if he crafts it for his daughter, he will do it lovingly. Much, much is different between the first and the second crafting, and much is different between the two chairs, too, though only he and his daughter may see the difference.”

As we work out of our love and gratitude for the Lord, this makes a difference in how we work and the kind of effort we give it. Working just for a paycheck often leads to doing just enough. Knowing that one is ultimately working for the Lord is meant to transform and upgrade a worker’s attitude and performance. And because we truly are serving the Lord in our jobs, Paul wrote that our faithful testimony in our jobs will be justly rewarded by the Lord one day.

Payday Someday

“Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ. But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons” (Col. 3:24-25).

We serve the Lord in our daily employment “knowing” we will be rewarded by our Master in heaven one day. The Lord promises to reward those who work with the kind of heart, integrity, and obedience described in verses 22-23. The word “reward” (v. 24) means recompence. It refers to what Christ will give in return for the work that believers do in the workplace.

This reward is called “the reward of the inheritance.” Believing Israel has a future inheritance in the Promised Land during Christ’s earthly kingdom (Matt. 5:5). For the Body of Christ, we learn of our inheritance from the message revealed to the Apostle Paul for the Church today. Paul referred to the believer’s inheritance earlier in this letter:

“Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light” (Col. 1:12).

When we trust Christ as our Savior, we are born again, by grace, into the family of God (Eph. 2:4-5; Titus 3:4-5). In Christ, believers enter a familial relationship that, in turn, legally bequeaths us an inheritance called “the inheritance of the saints in light.” This describes the believer’s position and standing before God in Christ in the light and glories of heaven (Col. 1:5). Our inheritance of eternity in heaven in Christ cannot be gained by works or lost by bad behavior. It is all of grace and is a gift received by faith alone.

However, “the reward of the inheritance” (Col. 3:24) is different from our “the inheritance of the saints in light.” The “reward of the inheritance” is something that can be gained or lost based on our service to Christ.

Colossians 3:24 tells us that one who serves the Lord in the workplace “shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ.” Thus, we see the receiving of reward is dependent upon good and faithful service rendered to Christ. Colossians 2:18 also warns the church of the possibility of losing rewards: “Let no man beguile [defraud or cheat] you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels….”

The reward of the inheritance refers to heavenly, spiritual, and eternal rewards. These will be given or withheld, won or lost when we stand before the Lord at the Judgment Seat of Christ (Rom. 14:10-12). It is at that day when each believer will individually stand before the Lord to give an account, that believers who faithfully labor in their jobs and ministries and serve the Lord in them will be recompensed and given an eternal reward by Him.

Your daily work goes into eternity. Your job has eternal significance. You might feel as if your work doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things. You get called out to a job for a sink that’s leaking, you fix the pipes like you’ve done a thousand times before, and you wonder what difference it makes. You go to your class every day and teach the children the things you’ve been teaching for many years, and you wonder if it is making any difference.

Work often feels futile and pointless. This passage reminds you that it isn’t. What you do matters forever. The kids you taught might not care that you poured your heart out teaching them, and they might not ever realize how much it helped them in life. In the house where you ably fixed the plumbing, conscientiously caring that you did a good job, the residents won’t remember you were there in a day or two, and they might not remember your name. But Christ cares. He knows. He won’t forget. He will reward you for it one day. Everything you did for the glory of Christ and as a godly testimony for Him will be remembered forever.

Regarding the receiving of the reward of the inheritance at the Judgment Seat of Christ, Paul further points out that, at that day, “he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons” (Col. 3:25).

The motives, attitudes, and conduct of the believing workman are the issue in this context. “He that doeth wrong” is obviously one who does the opposite of what is right, and in this context, it means to do the opposite of everything Paul said the believer should do in the workplace. It means to be habitually stubborn, insubordinate, and disobedient to the supervisor. It means to work with eyeservice and superficial cooperation, not giving a full effort or working as to the Lord.

Paul says when this kind of unfaithful workman stands before the Lord at the Judgment Seat, he will “receive for the wrong which he hath done” in the sense that he will receive nothing. “He shall suffer loss” of reward (cf. 1 Cor. 3:15). The heavenly rewards of our inheritance that we could have received from the Lord’s own hand, had we been faithful laborers, will be withheld.

At the Bema Seat, with “no respect of persons” (Col. 3:25), or without favoritism, the impartial Judge and Head of the Church will righteously judge the entire Body of Christ. On that day, every believer in Christ can expect to receive a reward for good conduct or suffer loss of reward for consistent misconduct in their daily employment. As 2 Corinthians 5:10 reminds us,

“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad.”

By the grace of God, may we resolve to be faithful, godly workers for the glory of our Savior!

“Lift up your eyes on high, and behold Who hath created these things, that bringeth out their host by number: He calleth them all by names by the greatness of His might, for that He is strong in power; not one faileth” (Isa. 40:26).

Mankind is told in this passage to look up and to direct our eyes toward the heavens to contemplate the stars because they teach us something: “behold Who hath created these things.” The number, order, glory, and harmony of the heavenly bodies demonstrate the infinite greatness and wisdom of the incomparable Creator.

“That bringeth out their host by number” has a military meaning, that God marches out the army of stars upon the plane of heaven as a general leads out his army upon the field of battle. The number of the stars surpasses man’s powers of computation, and God leads them all forth as a vast army under a mighty Leader. They are arrayed for us to see. The stars “declare the glory of God” (Psa. 19:1), and are evidence of “His eternal power and Godhead” (Rom. 1:20), and are meant to lead us to give God praise (Rom. 11:36; Rev. 4:11).

God knows His stars. Though they are innumerable, yet in His perfect wisdom He knows each one individually. He has given them their own unique attributes, and He fully knows each star in all its individual characteristics. From that knowledge and because they belong to Him, the Creator has given each star a unique name “He calleth them all by names by the greatness of His might.” I don’t know about you, but I have trouble remembering people’s names from one day to the next, but our omniscient God knows the names of trillions upon trillions of stars ( Job 38:31-32). And it is solely God’s unassisted power that conducts and sustains them all, “for that He is strong in power; not one faileth.”

If you ever wonder if God cares about you personally, then look up at a clear night sky and remember that He knows the name and every detail of each star in the universe. Then remember that He knows your name and everything about you, every single detail of your life. You are of more worth and value to Him than all the stars put together. We know that because Jesus Christ, this Almighty God Who created the stars, died for you personally.

Two Minutes with the Bible is now available on Alexa devices. Full instructions here.

The teaching of 1 Corinthians 8 deals with meat sacrificed to idols, but the broader application is that of our guidelines and actions regarding issues where there is liberty in the Christian life. This important chapter teaches us about our foremost responsibility to show love to others.

To Eat or Not to Eat

“Now as touching things offered unto idols…” (1 Cor. 8:1).

In Paul’s day, there were two places to buy meat: the market and the local pagan temples. Animals were sacrificed at these temples and their meat was offered to their gods and idols on pagan altars. Some of this meat was burned completely in honor of the god, and some was sold at the temple, where one could even sit and eat it (v. 10).

There was disagreement in the Corinthian church as to whether it was permissible to buy and eat meat from the pagan temple. There was also the issue of being served meat purchased at the temple as guests in someone else’s home. Some believers were against ever eating meat offered to idols and others did not have any problem with it.

One group of believers in Corinth said, “Don’t eat it! It’s unclean and wrong!” The other group said, “Looks good to me, and it tastes good too!” This might seem like a fight over steak or roast beef, but there was more to it; it was a doctrinal issue. The “unclean-and-wrong” believers thought that any animal offered to a pagan deity bore the taint of wicked idolatry. The “looks-good-and-tastes-good” believers did so knowing that pagan deities were not real, so the meat couldn’t be polluted, and these believers ate it with a clear conscience.

How about you? If you lived back then, would you have eaten meat that had been offered to an idol? Some of you might say yes; others might say no way. What Paul shows in this chapter is that neither answer is wrong, and the apostle’s greater interest was that the Church show love and grace, one to another, and not cause a brother or sister in Christ to stumble.

Knowledge with Love

“Now as touching things offered unto idols, we know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth. And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know. But if any man love God, the same is known of Him” (1 Cor. 8:1-3).

In verse 1, Paul wrote, “Now as touching things offered unto idols, we know that we all have knowledge.” The “knowledge” Paul referred to was knowledge about this subject. “Things offered unto idols” was not a subject about which the Corinthians were ignorant, and they each had their opinions and convictions (v. 7).

The Corinthians also had knowledge of their liberty in Christ. Previously, in 1 Corinthians (6:12), Paul had written of this liberty, that “All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient,” or profitable. God has granted the Church great liberty in Christ, but that liberty can be misused. As Galatians 5:13 reminds us, “For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.” Paul did not want the knowledge of their liberty to lead the Corinthians to become proud rather than loving toward others. As Paul noted in verse 1 of our text, “Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth.”

Knowledge is important in the Christian life. We need to know God’s Word (Psa. 119:125; Rom. 4:3), but mere intellectual knowledge that stands alone is incomplete. Knowledge without love produces pride because it can delude one into a sense of superiority. The words “puffeth up” mean to inflate, blow up, to cause to swell up with pride.

Knowledge without love can be a weapon that destroys and tears others down. One can be strong and mature in knowledge but weak and immature in love, or vice versa. To have knowledge without love or to have love without knowledge are both problems. Knowledge with love, knowing the Word and applying it to one’s life, is the call for the believer.

Paul’s point in this chapter is that it’s one thing to have knowledge of one’s liberty in Christ and to practice it, but knowledge by itself is not a sufficient guide in this matter of meat offered to idols because love is needed in consideration of the convictions and walk of fellow believers.

Paul added, “And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know.” If we think we have mastered the Scriptures or any subject in it, we can count on the fact that they have not. A mature believer is one who recognizes how little he or she does know. And the more we know, the humbler it can make us, because we know that we do not know completely and that there is always more to know, to grow in, and to understand in the depths of the wisdom of God’s Word.

The Apostle Paul tells us that, if one supposes that he knows anything of divine matters without love, he has not yet known and understood as he ought to know. We must subject what we know in God’s Word to love. Knowledge with love opens true understanding.

God knows them that love Him, Paul wrote in verse 3. Our relationship with God is about both knowledge and love. And the person who knows God and loves Him has true knowledge of Him. Likewise, in turn, if we are to treat believers with an edifying love, it stems from knowing God and loving Him and then loving others with the love of God by the power of the Holy Spirit.

One True God

“As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,) But to us there is but one God, the Father, of Whom are all things, and we in Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by Whom are all things, and we by Him” (1 Cor. 8:4-6).

Concerning the eating of foods that were offered in sacrifice to idols, Paul wrote, “we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one.” An idol is not real and alive. Since there is one God, then anything else that is called a god is not one. Idols are not competing gods. The stone, precious metal, or wood are real, but they are just a representation of a god that is a myth and the figment of man’s imagination. These fake gods exist only in the minds of their worshippers and not in reality (Isa. 37:19; Jer. 16:20). For example, if meat was offered to Zeus, there was and is no Zeus. Idols are nothing, and the meats offered to them therefore mean nothing and are entirely inconsequential.

There is not a god in or behind any idol; however, there are satanic, spiritual forces at work in idolatry (1 Cor. 10:20). The idols themselves are nothing, but the danger with idolatry lies in the demons working behind the scenes to deceive and to keep people from faith in the one, true, living God.

While there is only one God, Paul wrote there are many “that are called gods” (1 Cor. 8:5). Some of these gods were presumed to live in heaven, and others here on earth. The world then and the world today worship and serve these many fabricated, mythological “gods…and lords.”

“But to us,” Paul contrasted, “there is but one God, the Father, of Whom are all things, and we in Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ.” While the world has its polytheism, we are monotheistic. While “there be gods many, and lords many,” we know that there is one true God and one true Lord. “An idol is nothing” (v. 4), but the one true God is everything, and by Him, the Almighty Creator, everything in creation was made.

For Better or For Worse

“Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled. But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we the worse” (1 Cor. 8:7-8).

Some in the Corinthian church felt free to eat the meat that was offered to idols based on their liberty in Christ and their knowledge that idols are nothing. However, others did not have that knowledge and understanding of liberty and the nothingness of idols. They were conscious of the idol. For them, to eat the meat would be done with the thought that it had been sacrificed to the idols, which grated and upset their conscience. It was not just regular meat like any other meat for these believers.

Paul explained that “their conscience being weak is defiled.” Their conscience was weak, not because their conscience didn’t work, but because it overworked, and they put stipulations on themselves that were not necessary. Their conscience was still operating with the knowledge that there was something to idol worship that contaminated the meat and made eating it to be wrong. Thus, their weak conscience was defiled, and a defiled conscience is one that has been disregarded and transgressed, resulting in guilt and shame.

Paul added, “But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we “But to us there is but one God, the Father, of Whom are all things, and we in Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by Whom are all things, and we by Him.” 1 Corinthians 8:6 the worse.” In other words, you aren’t more spiritual if you know idols are nothing and you know you have the personal freedom to eat meat sacrificed to idols, and you do it. But also, you are not less spiritual for abstaining from eating meat sacrificed to idols. One didn’t gain or lose anything by eating the idol meat, and one didn’t gain or lose anything by refusing it.

What we do or do not choose to eat, does not make us more or less pleasing to God. Food is spiritually neutral. Those who enjoyed their liberty in Christ and ate meat sacrificed to idols did not make God more pleased with them. Those who abstained from it, thinking it unclean, did not make God less pleased with them. Before God, we are no better or worse if we partake or abstain from eating certain foods.

As the writer of Hebrews put it, “Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines. For it is a good thing that the heart be established with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been occupied therein” (Heb. 13:9).

Love Limits Liberty

“But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak. For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol’s temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols; And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died? But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ. Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend” (1 Cor. 8:9-13).

Under grace, it is not wrong for a believer to eat pork. With the change in dispensations, Paul tells the Church, “For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving” (1 Tim. 4:4). However, eating pork was wrong under the law of Moses, which prohibited it. Today, a believer is at perfect liberty to partake of pork chops, pulled pork, barbecued ribs, ham, pork roast, and
best of all, bacon.

However, suppose a Jewish person gets saved under grace and comes out of Judaism. He or she might still struggle with this liberty and might feel that it is still wrong to eat pork. It may take time to understand and come to live in the full enjoyment of the liberty that is in Christ, or the person may never eat pork.

A believer could possibly hinder the spiritual growth of one like this by flaunting the liberty today under grace and purposely eating pork in front of them. That’s the sort of thing Paul is teaching
about here.

Paul goes on to show that while there is nothing to gain with God by eating meat sacrificed to idols, there might be much to lose. There was nothing wrong with eating the meat offered to idols, and there was also nothing wrong with refusing to eat the meat offered to idols. However, a believer does wrong if he understands his liberty but, by practicing it, causes someone whose conscience is against it to stumble in his or her faith.

The practice of one’s liberty under grace can trip others up in life, and God does not want members of His church to cause other believers to stumble in their walk due to insensitive actions. Instead, in love, we are called to edify and build each other up (1 Cor. 8:1).

Those “which hast knowledge” (v. 10) that idols and the meat sacrificed to them were nothing were eating the meat hot off the altars and sitting at the temple to eat it. They saw idolatry for what it was. They did not participate in the pagan practices of the temple, but in their liberty and faith, they could associate with pagan people and eat a juicy steak at the temple with a completely clear conscience. And this was not wrong.

Where this became a problem, however, was “if any man see thee…sit at meat in the idol’s temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols…?” These brethren had not yet come to a place where they could say, “This is just meat, and it tastes good!” In their minds, it was still connected to the false worship of false gods, and it violated their conscience to eat it.

The trouble with a brother with a weak conscience seeing another Christian dining at a pagan temple, Paul says, was that the brother might be “emboldened” to join in and eat meat offered to idols and be encouraged to do what his conscience condemned. The believer who has a firm grasp on his liberty but does not use that liberty with care and love may give the weaker believer the boldness to run the red light of their conscience. And this was wrong.

The knowledge of one’s liberty was not to be the only factor that determined whether one ate idol meat or not. Love for a brother in Christ was an additional and significant factor to consider. Thus, love limits our liberty. In love, we are to always consider what effect our actions might have on others in the church.

Paul asked, “And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died?” The word “perish” means to destroy another’s well-being and peace or render useless. This is not speaking of the loss of one’s salvation, but rather the ruination or destruction of the working of God in one’s life. Our actions can impede the spiritual progress of other believer’s or even cause them to slip back into a lifestyle they had left when they got saved.

Paul reaches for the heart when he adds, “for whom Christ died.” That is how we are to view our brothers and sisters in Christ, as those who are deeply loved by Christ, for whom He shed His precious blood. And if Christ loved that brother enough to die for him, then we are to show him love by not putting any stumbling block in his way and not doing anything that might hinder his walk with the Lord. Paul further stated in verse 12 that causing a brother to stumble is more than just an offense against him; it is an offense against Christ and a sin against Him.

In light of these things, Paul concluded by putting himself in the place of the person who might cause another brother to stumble. Paul shows how far he would go, out of love, for the sake of not harming someone’s spiritual growth. And he said that if eating meat would harm a brother’s spiritual life, he would never eat meat again as long as the world stands! He would choose to abstain from eating meat forever if doing so would set a fellow believer back in his walk. In this matter of meat offered to idols, the spiritual well-being of other believers was the most important thing to Paul.

Although the subject of meats offered to idols is not a problem for most believers today, the principles that the Holy Spirit gives us in this section are valuable for this entire age. There are many things in our current world today which, while not expressly forbidden in God’s Word, might still cause believers with a weak conscience to be offended.

Our culture in the United States strongly promotes our personal rights. However, we need to remember that there is something more important than exercising our rights in the liberty we have under grace, and that is the work of God in the life of other believers.

Our actions in the Christian life are never to be based solely on what we know to be permissible for ourselves. Out of love, we also need to take the important, additional step of carefully considering how our actions will affect others in the Church, and then do what is best for them, not us.

Gay rights activist Father James Martin has accused Vice President J.D. Vance of misinterpreting the ancient Christian concept of ordo amoris, or the order of love.

The post Jesuit James Martin Says J.D. Vance Got ‘Ordo Amoris’ Wrong appeared first on Breitbart.

“Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God” (John 3:5)

A couple of verses earlier, the Lord Jesus Christ told the Pharisee, Nicodemus, “Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God” (3:3). The words “born again” literally mean born anew from above. Thus, Christ told Nicodemus that, in order to enter the kingdom of God, a person must receive a spiritual birth, a rebirth, a new life from above.

However, Nicodemus was taken aback and perplexed by Christ’s words about being born again, and he did not grasp their spiritual meaning. Understandably, he then asked the Lord absurd questions, expecting a negative answer, because surely Christ did not mean something as impossible as a second physical birth. Nicodemus asked, “How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born?” (3:4). The Lord answered that “Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit” (3:5), he can’t enter the kingdom of God.

Answering Nicodemus’s protest about being born after being fully grown or entering the mother’s womb a second time, the Lord pointed out to Nicodemus that there are two kinds of birth, of water and of the Spirit, meaning the natural and the spiritual. I believe that being born of water speaks of being born of the flesh, or physical birth. The breaking of the water in natural birth is what makes sense of the expression “of water and of the Spirit.” Being born of the Spirit (vv. 5-6) refers to the Holy Spirit’s work of renewal and spiritual rebirth. Thus, the Lord is describing birth and rebirth, being born and born again. He was saying that, unless one is born of a woman (“of water”) and born from above (“of the Spirit”), he cannot enter the kingdom of God. Referring to the two births, the Lord said in the next verse, “That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit” (3:6).

The old Christian adage, attributed to Martin Luther, is true: “Born once, die twice [Rev. 20:14-15]; born twice, die once.”

Two Minutes with the Bible is now available on Alexa devices. Full instructions here.

“Do the work of an evangelist.” Paul’s Spirit-inspired injunction in 2 Timothy 4:5 applies indirectly to every believer in Christ. Are not our pastors simply leaders in the work of the Lord? Shall the congregation sit idly by as the pastor alone does “the work of an evangelist?” God forbid! The pastor is rather to be an example to his flock to go and do likewise.

How well this writer recalls the days of the so-called Darby-Scofield movement when multitudes all over the country thronged to hear Bible teachers like Gaebelein, Gray, Gregg, Ottman, Chafer, and Newell. These able men of God expounded the Word as the “blessed hope” of the Lord’s return was being recovered. But these Bible teachers were evangelists too, in the truest sense of the word, and their evangelism was contagious.

In those days almost all premillenarians, including the young people, carried New Testaments in their pockets wherever they went. Why? They hoped and prayed for opportunities to testify to others about God’s plan of salvation through Christ, and they wanted to show them the way from Scripture. In those days, if a Christian failed to have a New Testament with him, he was apt to be reproved with the words: “What! a soldier without a sword?” By contrast, few believers carry New Testaments about with them today, and they certainly don’t carry Bibles!

Some are telling us today that this brand of fundamentalism is out of date and ineffective in these fast-changing times. We reply that all of us ought to get back to this brand of fundamentalism, this earnest effort to personally win souls to Christ by showing them God’s plan of salvation from the Scriptures.

God help his people in general and each spiritual leader in particular to “do the work of an evangelist.”

To the Reader:

Some of our Two Minutes articles were written many years ago by Pastor C. R. Stam for publication in newspapers. When many of these articles were later compiled in book form, Pastor Stam wrote this word of explanation in the Preface:

"It should be borne in mind that the newspaper column, Two Minutes With the Bible, has now been published for many years, so that local, national and international events are discussed as if they occurred only recently. Rather than rewrite or date such articles, we have left them just as they were when first published. This, we felt, would add to the interest, especially since our readers understand that they first appeared as newspaper articles."

To this we would add that the same is true for the articles written by others that we continue to add, on a regular basis, to the Two Minutes library. We hope that you'll agree that while some of the references in these articles are dated, the spiritual truths taught therein are timeless.

Two Minutes with the Bible is now available on Alexa devices. Full instructions here.